Which material is commonly used for a direct intracoronal filling that offers esthetics and good wear resistance?

Enhance your knowledge for the Advanced Chairside Practice Exam with comprehensive flashcards and multiple-choice quizzes. Prepare effectively to excel in your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which material is commonly used for a direct intracoronal filling that offers esthetics and good wear resistance?

Explanation:
For a direct intracoronal filling, you want a material that looks like a natural tooth and holds up to chewing forces. Composite resin fits this need because it is tooth-colored, providing excellent esthetics, and it bonds to enamel and dentin with adhesive systems, creating a strong seal and helping preserve tooth structure. Modern composites are designed to resist wear well, making them suitable for posterior surfaces as well as anterior ones. Finishing and polishing yield a smooth, enamel-like surface that resists plaque accumulation. Amalgam is very durable but not esthetic. Glass ionomer releases fluoride and bonds to dentin but generally wears more quickly under chewing. Resin-modified glass ionomer improves on wear and aesthetics compared with conventional GI, yet it still doesn’t match composite’s combination of esthetics and wear resistance in many intracoronal restorations.

For a direct intracoronal filling, you want a material that looks like a natural tooth and holds up to chewing forces. Composite resin fits this need because it is tooth-colored, providing excellent esthetics, and it bonds to enamel and dentin with adhesive systems, creating a strong seal and helping preserve tooth structure. Modern composites are designed to resist wear well, making them suitable for posterior surfaces as well as anterior ones. Finishing and polishing yield a smooth, enamel-like surface that resists plaque accumulation. Amalgam is very durable but not esthetic. Glass ionomer releases fluoride and bonds to dentin but generally wears more quickly under chewing. Resin-modified glass ionomer improves on wear and aesthetics compared with conventional GI, yet it still doesn’t match composite’s combination of esthetics and wear resistance in many intracoronal restorations.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy